๐ฌ๐๐๐ง๐ ๐ฎ.๐ฌ? ๐ง๐ฅ๐จ๐ ๐ฃ ๐ฆ๐๐๐ง๐ง๐๐ฅ๐ฆ ๐ก๐๐ช ๐ฆ๐ง๐๐ฅ๐ง ๐๐ก๐ ๐ฅ๐๐ช๐๐ฅ๐๐ฆ ๐ง๐๐ ๐๐๐ข๐๐๐ ๐ก๐จ๐๐๐๐๐ฅ ๐ข๐ฅ๐๐๐ฅ
Eelaththu Nilavan
Tamil National Historian | Analyst of Global Politics, Economics, Intelligence & Military Affairs
08/02/2026
๐๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐๐ฏ๐ฅ ๐ฐ๐ง ๐๐ณ๐ฎ๐ด ๐๐ฐ๐ฏ๐ต๐ณ๐ฐ๐ญ ๐ข๐ฏ๐ฅ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐๐ช๐ณ๐ต๐ฉ ๐ฐ๐ง ๐ข ๐๐ฆ๐ธ ๐๐ถ๐ค๐ญ๐ฆ๐ข๐ณ ๐๐จ๐ฆ
โฆ ๐ง๐๐ ๐๐๐ก๐๐ ๐๐ข๐๐๐๐ฃ๐ฆ๐ ๐ข๐ ๐ก๐๐ช ๐ฆ๐ง๐๐ฅ๐ง

Onย February 5, theย New START (Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty)ย officially expired, bringing an end to theย last surviving nuclear arms control agreementย between the United States and Russia. For over a decade, the treaty functioned as the final guardrail restraining the worldโs two largest nuclear arsenals, together accounting for nearlyย 90% of global nuclear weapons.
With its expiration:
โข All legal caps on deployed strategic warheads are gone
โข On-site inspections and data exchanges have ceased
โข Transparency mechanisms have vanished overnight
This moment marks not merely the death of a treaty, but the collapse of the post-Cold War nuclear architecture itself.
โฆ ๐ง๐ฅ๐จ๐ ๐ฃโ๐ฆ ๐๐๐๐๐จ๐๐๐ง๐๐ ๐ฅ๐จ๐ฃ๐ง๐จ๐ฅ๐
President Donald Trump rejected extending New START, arguing that it represents an outdated bilateral model ill-suited to modern strategic realities. Instead, Washington is pushing for a new framework written on U.S. terms, reflecting:
โข Emerging technologies (hypersonic weapons, space warfare)
โข Multipolar nuclear dynamics
โข The rise of China as a strategic peer
Trumpโs decision signals a clear doctrine:
โฝ Arms control will no longer be about mutual restraint, but about strategic dominance.
This approach echoes Yalta-style power politics, where global order is reshaped not through consensusโbut through leverage.
โฆ ๐ ๐ข๐ฆ๐๐ข๐ชโ๐ฆ ๐ฅ๐๐ฆ๐ฃ๐ข๐ก๐ฆ๐: ๐๐ฅ๐ข๐ ๐ฅ๐๐๐ฅ๐๐ง ๐ง๐ข ๐ฅ๐๐๐ฅ๐ ๐๐ ๐๐ก๐ง
The Kremlin publicly expressed regret, noting it had proposed a one-year extension to preserve stability. Washingtonโs refusal ended that possibility.
Russia has now declared:
โข It is no longer bound by New START limits
โข Nuclear force planning will proceed without legal constraints
โข Strategic deterrence will be recalibrated for worst-case scenarios
This marks a decisive shift from managed rivalry to unrestricted strategic competition.
โฆ ๐ง๐๐ โ๐๐๐๐ก๐ ๐๐๐๐ง๐ข๐ฅโ ๐๐ก๐ ๐ง๐๐ ๐๐ก๐ ๐ข๐ ๐๐๐ฃ๐ข๐๐๐ฅ ๐๐ฅ๐ ๐ฆ ๐๐ข๐ก๐ง๐ฅ๐ข๐
Washington insists that China must be included in any future arms control regime due to its rapidly expanding nuclear arsenal.
However:
โข China has rejected formal trilateral negotiations
โข Beijing argues its arsenal is still far smaller than U.S. and Russian stockpiles
โข Inclusion would legitimize American nuclear superiority
The result is a strategic deadlockโwhere no power wants to limit itself first, and mistrust replaces diplomacy.
โฆ ๐ง๐๐ ๐๐๐ก๐๐๐ฅ๐ข๐จ๐ฆ ๐๐๐ง๐๐ฅ๐ ๐๐ง๐: ๐ ๐ช๐ข๐ฅ๐๐ ๐ช๐๐ง๐๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐ก๐จ๐๐๐๐๐ฅ ๐๐จ๐๐ฅ๐๐ฅ๐๐๐๐ฆ
With New START gone, the world enters its most unstable nuclear phase since the 1960s.
Key Risks Include:
โข โ No inspections โ no verification
โข โ No data sharing โ strategic blind spots
โข โ No ceilings โ quantitative arms races
โข โ Faster decision-making under uncertainty
In such an environment, miscalculation becomes as dangerous as intent.
โฆ ๐ฅ๐จ๐ฆ๐ฆ๐๐โ๐ฆ ๐ฆ-๐ฑ๐ฌ๐ฌ ๐ฃ๐ฅ๐ข๐ ๐๐ง๐๐๐จ๐ฆ: ๐ง๐๐ โ๐๐ข๐๐๐๐ก ๐๐ข๐ ๐โ ๐๐ข๐๐ง๐ฅ๐๐ก๐
Against this backdrop, Russia has unveiled its most ambitious defensive system yetโthe S-500 Prometheus.
Operational Reality (Early 2026):
โข First regiment fully operational since December 2025
โข Designed by Almaz-Antey
โข Initially deployed around Moscow, with plans for nationwide coverage
The S-500 represents a paradigm shiftโfrom deterrence by retaliation to deterrence by denial.
โฆ ๐ง๐๐๐๐ก๐๐๐๐ ๐ฆ๐จ๐ฃ๐๐ฅ๐๐ข๐ฅ๐๐ง๐ฌ ๐ข๐ ๐ง๐๐ ๐ฆ-๐ฑ๐ฌ๐ฌ
The system integrates air, missile, and space defense into a single battle network:
โข Detection Range: Up to 600 km
โข Engagement Range: 500โ600 km
โข Altitude: Up to 200 km (near space)
โข Interceptor Speed:Mach 10โ12
โข Hypersonic Tracking: 10 targets simultaneously
โข Targets:
โ Ballistic missiles
โ Cruise missiles
โ Stealth aircraft (F-22, F-35)
โ Drones
โ Low-orbit satellites
This effectively blurs the boundary between air defense and space warfare.
โฆ ๐๐ก๐ง๐-๐ฆ๐๐ง๐๐๐๐๐ง๐ ๐ช๐๐ฅ๐๐๐ฅ๐ ๐๐ก๐ ๐ง๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐ง๐๐ฅ๐๐ญ๐๐ง๐๐ข๐ก ๐ข๐ ๐ฆ๐ฃ๐๐๐
Russian officials have openly acknowledged the S-500โs anti-satellite capabilities, signaling a willingness to:
โข Blind adversary ISR networks
โข Disrupt command-and-control systems
โข Paralyze NATOโs space-dependent warfare doctrine
In a post-New START world, space becomes the next nuclear frontier.
โฆ ๐ ๐ข๐ฆ๐๐ข๐ชโ๐๐๐๐๐๐ก๐: ๐ ๐ก๐๐ช ๐ฆ๐ง๐ฅ๐๐ง๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ซ๐๐ฆ
As U.S.โRussia relations deteriorate, Russia and China are tightening strategic coordination, including:
โข Missile defense interoperability
โข Nuclear signaling alignment
โข Shared opposition to U.S.-led arms regimes
This emerging axis represents the end of Western monopoly over global nuclear rule-making.
โฆ ๐ฌ๐๐๐ง๐ ๐ฎ.๐ฌ: ๐ ๐ช๐ข๐ฅ๐๐ ๐ฅ๐๐๐ฅ๐๐ช๐ก ๐๐ฌ ๐๐ข๐ฅ๐๐
Just as Yalta (1945) reshaped the post-World War II order, todayโs collapse of New START signals a repartitioning of powerโnot through treaties, but through:
โข Technological superiority
โข Strategic coercion
โข Nuclear posturing
The age of arms control is giving way to an age of raw deterrence.
โฆ ๐๐ข๐ก๐๐๐จ๐ฆ๐๐ข๐ก: ๐ ๐ ๐ข๐ฅ๐ ๐๐๐ก๐๐๐ฅ๐ข๐จ๐ฆ ๐ช๐ข๐ฅ๐๐
The expiration of New START is not an isolated diplomatic failureโit is a civilizational turning point.
Without rules, inspections, or trust:
โข Nuclear weapons regain political centrality
โข Defensive systems like the S-500 redefine deterrence
โข Miscalculation becomes existential
The world has entered a post-arms-control era, where peace is no longer negotiatedโbut enforced.
Written by


Eelaththu Nilavan
Tamil National Historian | Analyst of Global Politics, Economics, Intelligence & Military Affairs
08/02/2026